By continuing to browse our site you agree to our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.
In Cyprus, an old argument is suddenly burning hotter than ever: are the island's British military bases protecting it – or painting a target on it?
The question exploded back into public debate after a drone strike hit RAF Akrotiri, one of Britain's two sovereign base areas on the island. Cypriot officials say it came from Lebanon, while two more combat drones were later intercepted off Cyprus.
The incident has shaken nerves and reopened a sensitive national conversation about security, sovereignty and whether Cyprus is being pulled into a wider regional conflict against its will.
The government has tried to calm fears, insisting the Republic of Cyprus is not involved in military operations. But that reassurance has not stopped growing unease. For many Cypriots, the real issue is whether the continued presence of the British bases now makes the island more exposed to threats it did not choose.
Among the loudest critics is DIKO MP Chrysi Pantelides, who says that if Cyprus had the choice in 2026, it would not accept foreign bases on the island at all. She describes the British military bootprint as a "colonial remnant" and an outdated reality that no longer fits the times.
For opponents of Britain's ongoing military presence, the latest strike is only the latest proof that the bases are not a neutral issue – they may carry consequences for all of Cyprus.
Pantelides also stressed a longstanding demand from both political leaders and the public: that the bases should not be used for offensive operations beyond Cyprus's control. President Nikos Christodoulides has been clear, she said, that the Republic itself is not taking part in any military action.
Still, public opinion remains sharply divided.
Some residents are furious and say the British should leave altogether. One local said that if Britain wants to stay, it should be responsible for protecting the whole island. Another was even more blunt, saying the bases provide "nothing at all" and have only dragged Cyprus into danger.
But others see things very differently. Supporters argue the British presence still brings stability, jobs and tourism. One resident insisted the bases help visitors feel safe, boosting the local economy.
So now, after the strike on Akrotiri, Cyprus is once again facing a deeply uncomfortable question: do the British bases shield the island, or put it in greater peril? For now, Cyprus is trying to stay out of the fighting — but the pressure over Britain's long-term role is only growing.
In Cyprus, an old argument is suddenly burning hotter than ever: are the island's British military bases protecting it – or painting a target on it?
The question exploded back into public debate after a drone strike hit RAF Akrotiri, one of Britain's two sovereign base areas on the island. Cypriot officials say it came from Lebanon, while two more combat drones were later intercepted off Cyprus.
The incident has shaken nerves and reopened a sensitive national conversation about security, sovereignty and whether Cyprus is being pulled into a wider regional conflict against its will.
The government has tried to calm fears, insisting the Republic of Cyprus is not involved in military operations. But that reassurance has not stopped growing unease. For many Cypriots, the real issue is whether the continued presence of the British bases now makes the island more exposed to threats it did not choose.
Among the loudest critics is DIKO MP Chrysi Pantelides, who says that if Cyprus had the choice in 2026, it would not accept foreign bases on the island at all. She describes the British military bootprint as a "colonial remnant" and an outdated reality that no longer fits the times.
For opponents of Britain's ongoing military presence, the latest strike is only the latest proof that the bases are not a neutral issue – they may carry consequences for all of Cyprus.
Pantelides also stressed a longstanding demand from both political leaders and the public: that the bases should not be used for offensive operations beyond Cyprus's control. President Nikos Christodoulides has been clear, she said, that the Republic itself is not taking part in any military action.
Still, public opinion remains sharply divided.
Some residents are furious and say the British should leave altogether. One local said that if Britain wants to stay, it should be responsible for protecting the whole island. Another was even more blunt, saying the bases provide "nothing at all" and have only dragged Cyprus into danger.
But others see things very differently. Supporters argue the British presence still brings stability, jobs and tourism. One resident insisted the bases help visitors feel safe, boosting the local economy.
So now, after the strike on Akrotiri, Cyprus is once again facing a deeply uncomfortable question: do the British bases shield the island, or put it in greater peril? For now, Cyprus is trying to stay out of the fighting — but the pressure over Britain's long-term role is only growing.